This complaint is about the opportunity for public review and
comment for the 1998 – 2003 forest development plan (FDP) for the
Small Business Forest Enterprise Program (SBFEP) of the Salmon Arm
The complainant believes that public consultation was inadequate
because he did not know that the Ministry of Forests planned to
harvest 11 cutblocks in the Blind Bay area until May 2000, even
though the cutblocks were approved as part of the 1998 FDP. In
addition, the complainant believes that the newspaper advertisements
for the public review of the FDP were inadequate because they
misleadingly indicated that development was planned in the White
Lake area, when in reality it was planned for the Blind Bay area.
The Board decided that the investigation would examine:
- whether or not the notice of the opportunity to review and
comment on the 1998 FDP complied with the requirements of the
Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act and
regulations (the Code); and
- whether or not the opportunity to review and comment on the
FDP was adequate.
The ministry complied with the Code in notifying the public about
the opportunity to review and comment on the 1998 – 2003 SBFEP
The opportunity to review and comment on the FDP was adequate.
However, in light of the complainant’s expressed interest in the
Perris Creek area, it would have been preferable, despite not being
a Code requirement, for the complainant to receive direct notice of
the opportunity to review the 1998 SBFEP FDP.
The Board notes that the district has taken significant steps
since 1998 to improve notices and the public review and comment
opportunity. It is now district policy to contact water licensees,
including the complainant, by letter to advise them of planned
development and review and comment opportunities. In addition, the
advertisements for the 2001 SBFEP FDP show marked improvement over
the 1998 ads in that they are more visible and understandable. Open
houses are also held in more communities, and are more